September 6, 2010
Actually I wanted to case (s) Sarrazin not even add my two cents. Due to the recent development but I can not help, yes, I feel even obliged to address a few lines to you.
Just the other day we were able to see how a major whistleblower platform, a protected space for informants, was publicly slaughtered. Of all. Without exception. Due to negligence, for that matter, misconduct in a case. Forgotten was suddenly what was there previously disclosed to secret documents and still is, and served as the backup of our democracy. Power self-circumcision school now?
Thilo Sarrazin has written a book in which he made his point of view - having regard to induce pulled him Statistics - pointing out deficiencies in the integration policy in Germany. That is his right, a vested even, namely the freedom of expression. Something that was laboriously "fought" to the freedom of the press is made.
The man speaks also of something, knowing that it might be unpleasant for some and that he endangers himself and his office with it. This is called moral courage.
Is an entirely different matter, whether one agrees or not Mr. Sarrazin. A clear majority of citizens in this country seems to be his opinion, if we may believe many flash polls. The media, however, like most deputies, stiffen straight to "political correctness" and contradict outraged, as recently again in "Maybrit Illner" . Especially on the part of these instances but should still be invoked in a functioning democracy, at least to an objective debate: the press as the "fourth estate", the politicians as representatives of the people!
Even in the blogosphere is a noticeable polarization, a latent emotion, as if the ghosts on Sarrazin topic. Meanwhile, it is just there to reveal inconsistencies: Sarrazin's book is at the German publishing house (DVA) published, associated for some years to Random House Publishing Group. Random House, in turn, is part of the Bertelsmann Group. That media giant that is for many the epitome of evil, not only because of fallen into the discussion Bertelsmann Foundation - also its due to market power and the connections to the supposed power brokers in the background, especially the Bilderbergers (the American activist-journalist Alex Jones According to the eugenics advocate).
Well then, but fits: flight you explain Sarrazin also a eugenicist , and also he should have said yes even derogatory about Jews (he really?). Regardless, it fits so even better.
If only, if the word "if" would not be ...
Are Bilderbergers and company put not one for an authorized EU, ie to nation-states , and for a world government, for the abolition of borders, for a mixing of peoples? Prompts Sarrazin with his book - directly or indirectly - not the exact opposite?
Larger publishers, like other companies, obey, especially one: the law of the market. With Sarrazin's book , from which the sixth edition was sent to press (total circulation is now 250,000 Ex.), as revealed by publishing side - and six days after the show! - Can do right now.
In exactly this mechanism is the opportunity to promote truly relevant topics.
Can confirm this is the journalist Oliver Janich, who managed to accommodate several critical articles in FOCUS MONEY, including the climate hoax, the monetary system and 9.11. Why? Because he insists, the reader response was great and: because the editor was convinced by sales. Janichs latest coup, a look-up to September 11, incidentally, appears next Wednesday - again in FOCUS MONEY.
Come to me now just not so, but that was all "much earlier" controlled by, serve the confusion or other excuses for their own vindication. Ask yourself, what you do for the preservation of the right to freedom of expression.
- Advertisement -
"The man speaks also of something, knowing that it might be unpleasant for some and that he endangers himself and his office with it. This is called moral courage. "
It would be interesting once, to ascertain what happened to journalists and bloggers in connection with the Causa Sarrazin and was made, in terms of risk and courage.
Especially the inner workings of the "Fourth Estate" has to be questioned now.
See Sarrazin in no way a racist or a troublemaker, but finally a politician who calls the bungling immigration policy by name. In the same breath as Sarrazin also, unfortunately, died far too young Kirsten Heisig must be named with her book "The End of Patience. As a juvenile court judge she was confronted daily with these migration problems and directly involved in shoulder to shoulder with Turkish and Arab institutions for prevention.
The Sarrazin has unfortunately raised genes also found already regret, since all media firmly bite it and it ableiteten the content. The book, as well as that of Heisig, should be easy to read times in order to understand the required Notwendikeit a change to immigration policy.
Man, man, man, so much verquastes scribblings before the "point" comes ... -da Sarrazin in the supposedly nationalist, skin score, he can not be of bilerbergschen or bertelsmannschem shore ... -these whole "left conspiracy theorists 'listen' s simply not the shot ... -da need's already a real precious blocker ...
Sarrazin's theses are the attempt of accomplices to the installation of neoliberal kleptocracy in Europe, the part of the deceived, the other part, namely the already impoverished to present as a scapegoat. And because with a shot xenophobia, the better for the "IMAGE (s) readers" arrives, he hits just still neat Moslem-bashing on it. And that is indeed in the interest of Bertelsmann and Bilderberg!
Interesting that you consider this as a "point", which is only a "sideshow" is for me.
And Bilderbergers & Bertelsmann: What now, Honk, hott or Hüh? Slightly less contradiction in his own scribblings would be advisable if you lambasting other so violently.
Strange, your "sideshow" seems to me to be the only concrete inexpressible in your article ... -can be, I, appearing problems with your me a very progressive, writing style (vulgo: scribblings), have!
And since we wär'n at the next point:
"And Bilderbergers & Bertelsmann: What now, Honk, hott or Hüh?"
Sorry, I do not understand the question, even after the supposed contradictions ... (-about between Bilderberg and Bertelsmann?)
See Bilderberg conferences and the work of the Bertelsmann Foundation, in my opinion, largely from an almost identical mindset and Interessenparalellität, the respective parties instead ... -I bet the "good old" R. Mohn was determined on at least one Bilderberg conference.
Honk
"Specifically, tangible," probably because you feel attracted to this point personally. Do not worry.
No, the opposition was not referring to "Bilderberg Group and Bertelsmann", but your reasoning in terms of Sarrazin. Do you know the man personally, that you believe, so just to know about his motives decision? What do you justify your allegations in this respect?
Or you are one of the you mentioned "impoverished" and just turn your way around reality, to find a scapegoat for their "fate"?
PS: I do not know that we have that you offered us. So please respect the form. Thank you.
http://www.taz.de/1/leben/koepfe/artikel/1/das-black-schaf/
As parents, the Sarrazin have not reached their own yardstick. An academic-child with such success!
So that no one misunderstands me: The son is totally understandable.
Sarrazin has also another 1000 € extra out acted on his departure from the BuBa.
Who writes a book by it to "right" and "wrong"
Children goes, but himself in this respect is a bust, these 1000 € his son would be so does not come out that he refutes himself. What a great elites! Keep all invulnerable.
Pure human neglect!