What's going on in Iran? Only dominate the re-election of President Ahmadinejad (or better the fuss about their legality), demonstrating masses, insurgents as dead, for weeks the newscasts and front pages of the tabloids - until, yes until the death of a halblebigen individuals all with a bang in the background urges Michael Jackson is dead. But to this it should not go here.
But to Iran. The tenor of the coverage in the western Mainsttreammedien is nearly uniform (the evil Ahmadinejad, Mousavi the opposition of the Good), and yet some people wonder: Is it really a positive message when Ahmadinejad gets in their own country under attack?
Every day we are presented with images Menschenaufläufen, seemingly all opponents of Ahmadinejad, millions, or at least hundreds of thousands of protesting Iranians are talking. Even mothers favorite Günther Jauch blew in his self-produced Star TV show recently the same tune, but was corrected by the foreign correspondent: Tens of thousands they saw on the streets, not hundreds of thousands. Jauch had invited "to fit" Amene Bahraminava (those mutilated Iranian women, who now may be the court legitimizes "an eye for an eye" revenge on her tormentor) to demonstrate the depraved regime in all its rawness.
From the Iranian Guardian Council was then given suddenly, that it probably still was any irregularity - (alleged and not as last of protesters 170) in 50 cities, the turnout was more than 100% - these were not decisive either . A cancellation of the election was also excluded.
A dedicated blogger was able to show that not only the elections in Iran, but also the coverage in Western media manipulated was. So the LA Times had shown a photo of a pro-Ahmadinejad rally (also seems to have given it accordingly), which was translated writes the lyrics in the BBC promptly in a pro-Mousavi demonstrations.
Be underpinned media reports like with more or less private photos from blogs and personal messages via social networks and short messaging systems like Twitter, Facebook & Co. But how seriously can we take these messages? Iran is a country which, according to CNN today has 23 million Internet users, about one-third of the population ie, to about 60,000 bloggers. "Ec hte first-hand information, passed on rumors and deliberate misinformation are virtually indistinguishable," wrote the "shadow-boxing " sure deal. To what extent where was censored, is hardly verifiable. The CIA is all over the (dis) information policies finger in the pie (had) have.
Who can you believe that? Mousavi like stretches over the mantle of reformer. The fact that he is actually a, may be doubted. The fact is, namely, that he was from 1981 to 1989, in the time of the Iran-Iraq war, prime minister under Ayatollah Khomeini, a post which was merged after the expiration of his term of office with the President. Behind Mousavi am so Spreerauschen.net , another powerful man. Rafsanjani, Iran's president from 1989 to 1997 and a close confidant of Khomeini "stone kingdom, unpopular and corrupt to the teeth," he was, it continues with the conjecture that the real power struggle in Iran not abspiele approximately between Mousavi and Ahmadinejad, but "between Rafsanjani and the man behind Ahmadinejad and indeed the godfather Ayatollah Khamenei".
Without a doubt: Ahmadinejad is a dictator. And with the freedom of the press and various civil rights, it is in the Iranian theocracy not far away. One thing is certain: Ahmadinejad is the only Residual who dares to offer the American Imperial Policy in the Middle East forehead. So far at least. And that's not the worst - if there is no escalation. Could now face after enough media oil was poured into the fire of fronts. We still know the drill from Iraq.
Obama held initially suspicious posh back, but then asked Twitter to keep the maintenance short to not overturn the resistance - and warned Iran did finally. Some clearly was "old master" Kissinger and threatened him with the same regime change - and where the man makes demands on the world stage, knows the well-informed, breaks often shortly after a war or at least a revolt. But perhaps the United States is Israel so alone before ...?
Gloomy outlook. We hope for the best - that relaxes the situation. It remains unclear in each case. My recommendation therefore: Form for yourself their opinion, if possible based on various sources of information.
- Advertisement -
Hi,
can classify the events in Iran right, only who knows the recent history of the country and the involvement of the "West" in particular the United States.
Hardly anyone here knows about the CIA-controlled overthrow of the democratically elected Iranian President Dr. Mossadegh., 1953
The installation of the west controlled the Shah's secret police, Savak plus.
The Iranians, however, have never forgotten this.
Even today it would be interesting even to examine how CIA / Mossad have their finger on the demos in the game.
It is indeed screamed loudly electoral fraud, concrete evidence to have been but never called.
No, I'm not necessarily a friend of the Iranian system and am always on the side of freedom and human rights.
On the other hand, I can not see where because the West intends to find the moral integrity to judge Iran?
How can we democracy, freedom of expression and press freedom in foreign demand and even at home these rights limit ever?
Our system is so corroded by corruption, that true progress and justice are no longer possible.
Oppression and violence, the law of the jungle are the norm.
The people in the West should just once for 10 min. enable Iran before they give their unqualified opinion.
If you freedom, human rights, democracy are really important, they should fight for it ... and in our own country!
Btw: The war against Iran is already under way. For years perpetrate funded and trained by the United States mercenaries (Al Qaeda etc.) an underground war with the aim of destabilizing Iran. Agent of Zion commit assassinations of technicians civilian nuclear program.
Iran is already enclosed on 3 sides.
The time now is like out in the run up to the Iraq war and brought the Western population before the war in mood, a similar propaganda campaign.
The important seems to be the behavior of our population. Are we willing to accept this war?
I watch as more and more people begin to ask more and more questions. They distrust the corporate media and find out more by alternative media in the world network.